Some of these things suck more than the others (2007 Holiday Edition)
SUCK: Getting hit by a paralegal who decided to throw her car into reverse and punch the gas, rather than look behind her and calmly pull out of her spot -- which is how my workday ended yesterday. One cracked taillight, one cracked rear bumper and one significant dent in the body panel later... I'm looking at a logistical, financial and insurance hassle that, quite frankly, I hadn't anticipated when I turned off my computer and headed down to the parking lot last night.
SUCK: Potty training blows the big one. We went through it with TheHurricane, and now we're in the midst of it with Butterfly. (Rabbit has made it clear she has no interest in the process at this time.) The cool thing is that Butterfly has taken pretty quickly to the idea of peeing on the potty -- sure, there are daily accidents (is there anything that puts you in the holiday spirit more quickly than trying to scrub human urine off a wool oriental rug? For the second time that day?), but overall it's a tremendous developmental jump. The not-so-cool thing is that she's terrified of doing the poo thing, and as a result hasn't... uh... unleashed the hounds, shall we say, for five days. I'm pretty sure she's going to explode soon.
SUCK: The movie Shooter, which transformed Stephen Hunter's fantastic thriller Point of Impact into a functional-but-entirely-generic shoot-em-up action spectacular, with a functional-but-entirely-generic Mark Wahlberg playing a haunted ex-military sniper who, per Hunter's vision, should, would and could have been a career-defining role for a young Clint Eastwood-type... Viggo in full A History of Violence mode is probably a good point of reference. Instead? Another inane film bastardization of a book that deserved much, much better.
SUCK: This whole Johan Santana thing. The tension is killing me. Yeah, I know... in theory, it's extremely cool to be able to spend a baseball off-season tantalized by a blockbuster trade on this level (see: Kevin Garnett). On the other hand... the possibility that Santana might land with the Yankees just makes me nauseous, and while I'm loathe (that's right: I'm loathe) to give up a CF as dynamic and exciting as a young Johnny Damon Jacoby Ellsbury, the thought of a 1-2 Beckett/Santana punch is too much to pass up... and the tension of looking at ESPN.com multiple times every day to see if there's any progress is beginning to wear on me.
SUCK: You know what? I'm going to go back to the first one. I'm just really, really ticked off that anyone with the brains to function as a paralegal would do something as stupid as that. She didn't even really apologize -- just stood there talking about how she was planning to go Christmas shopping, and how this was something she didn't need... meanwhile, I'm just standing there, trying to stay calm and reasonable, picking pieces of my taillight off the ground, resisting the overwhelming temptation to just unleash all kinds of pent-up anger on her. (Good lord, did I want to unleash.) And the ironic part? We just got our other car back from the body shop last weekend. In fact, when I heard her accelerating into me and then the giant SMASH!!!! my first thoughts - beyond the obligatory "Fuck!" - were "I just got finished dealing with this crap..."
NO SUCK: 13-0. I'm just sayin'... there's good, and there's scary good. I think it's pretty clear which one we're talking about here.
NO SUCK: The joy - and really, there is no better word - on my kids' faces every night when I bring them home, walk into our living room and turn on the Christmas tree. If the sound of three little kids jumping up and down and screaming with delight, "Christmas lights! Christmas lights!" can't bring a smile to your face, then the great empty black chasm in your chest where your soul should be is even bigger than mine.
But I loooove Jacoby Ellsbury. I don't want to give him up for anyone. Anyone!
Also, I'm sorry about your car. And really impressed that you didn't unleash it on her. Because I totally would have.
Posted by:Jess | December 12, 2007 at 09:36 AM
So does that mean the littlest ones got over the Scary Santa thing? That's progress.
An ex of mine got into a car accident soon after purchasing his new car. His first thoughts were, "why can't i have nice things?"
Hopefully she'll come up 100% at fault.
Posted by:claire | December 12, 2007 at 11:19 AM
Jess -- let's just say that I was a ticking time bomb by the time I got home, and that my kids picked a very good night to be very, very good. (A couple of Ipswich Winter Ales and an hour boiling in my whirlpool tub also proved helpful.)
Claire -- The Santa thing is a work in progress. The process wasn't helped by a story we all saw on the news this morning, where a guy dressed in a Santa outfit robbed a convenience store. They had security camera footage and everything. (Not. Helpful.)
Posted by:TwoBusy | December 12, 2007 at 11:39 AM
#1 Was she on the phone? yes to "suck".
#2 Starting it now with Peanut. Yes to "suck".
#3 Watched it while in a bar. Yes to generic. Yes to "suck".
#4 No for Ellsbury. Maybe to Coco/Lester.Yes to "suck".
#5 Probably doing her makeup, too? Yes to "suck".
#6 I'll be there this Sunday. Yes to "no suck".
#7 Our tree was turned on before 6 am this morning. Yes to "no suck" (as long as its a reasonable hour).
Posted by:above average joe | December 12, 2007 at 12:48 PM
AAJ -- ooooohhh... Pats/Jets? Be sure to wear a slicker -- it'll be like a Gallagher concert, only with human blood instead of watermelons.
Posted by:TwoBusy | December 12, 2007 at 01:43 PM
Here's the deal...I am a diehard Twins fan up here in the frozen tundra. I don't care which team, you guys or the "evil empire" gets him. I want the best bang for my buck in a trade. If we give up Johann, then I want Ellsbury and Lester...throw in Crisp for good measure. I'm tired of getting ripped off because my team is a small market team...I know it could backfire and we'd get nothing but draft picks and he signs with you guys or the yanks next year. But, please...God please...be good to the Twins and give us a Christmas present fans here deserve.
Posted by:stebujiji | December 12, 2007 at 02:52 PM
Stebujiji -- If I were a Twins fan, I'd feel the same way (actually, I'm not sure I'd want Coco). But the reality of baseball economics - at least, as I understand it - is that NOBODY gives up two newly-minted, MLB-ready cheap, talented players under any circumstances.
That being said... if there's a scenario that might force an adjustment of that business sense, it'd be Johan. Honestly, I think the Twins are being very cagey and smart in waiting -- hoping that either Steinbrenner or Theo will blink and agree to either Lester/Ellsbury or Cabrera/Hughes/Kennedy. Clearly, the Yanks are capable off backing off an ultimatum if it suits their needs (see: ARod), so you can never count them out. As for the Sox...
(stomach churning again)
Posted by:TwoBusy | December 12, 2007 at 03:34 PM
I feel a little sick about losing Ellsbury, whom I *love*. I'd rather give up Lester AND Buchholtz, whom I surprisingly can't stand (yes, yes, I do not like Clay Buchholz. I have my reasons!)
That being said, yes OH HELL YES, I want Santana, and I don't want the Yanks to have him. But I said that about Gagne, too, and look how well that worked out.
Oh the image of your little kids is too cute for me to stand. Adorable.
Posted by:jonniker | December 12, 2007 at 10:02 PM
Try the sticker chart for motivation. A full week of stickers = present. Worked like a charm for us! Oh, and I big boy (girl) pants. Except for that firs time I put him in them and said, "Now tell me when you have to go pee pee!" Ten minutes later, while sitting on the couch. "I'm making peepee!!" No, dude. BEFORE.
Posted by:Xdm | December 14, 2007 at 11:31 PM